Comparative Analysis of Cost Flow Assumptions and the Merchandise Inventory Recording System at UD Agung Pratama

Authors

  • Atik Tri Andari Polinema PSDKU Kediri
  • Novie Astuti Setianingsih Polinema PSDKU Kediri
  • Erza Wahyudia Pawestri Polinema PSDKU Kediri

Keywords:

Cost Flow Assumption, Merchandise Inventory, Recording System

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparison of calculations between the assumption of cost flows and the system of recording merchandise inventory in UD Agung Pratama. This study uses quantitative and descriptive methods to analyze merchandise inventory data from 2019–2020. This research analysis technique uses FIFO and average methods through periodic and perpetual inventory system analysis. The results of this study prove that the calculation of inventory using the FIFO method, both in the periodic and perpetual systems, produces a higher net profit value when compared to the calculation using the average method in both the periodic and perpetual systems. The calculation results of the FIFO method show the lowest value of cost of goods sold and the highest value of final inventory. Therefore, the calculation of inventory in UD Agung Pratama is expected to use the FIFO method, and the inventory system uses a perpetual system because it shows accurate and detailed inventory values.

References

Aisyania, S. (2020). Analisis Penerapan Metode Pencatatan dan Penilaian Persediaan Dagangan pada CV Hubbul Hidayah Group Palembang. Palembang: Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya.

Aprilia, N. M. (2020). Analisis Perhitungan Persediaan dengan Metode First In First Out (FIFO), Last In First Out (LIFO) dan Average pada UKM Megah Sandal Mojokerto Tahun 2020. Mojokerto: Universitas Islam Majapahit.

Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan IAI. (2014). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (SAK) No. 14: Persediaan. Jakarta: Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Eko Yuli. (2009). Ekonomi. Salatiga: CV Mitra Media Pustaka

Indriantoro, N., & Supomo, B. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: BPFE-YOGYAKARTA.

Imaduddin Aksan, Delphian R., et al. (2021). Akuntansi Syariah. Cv Widina Media Utama.

Lestari, D., Subagyo, & Limantara, A. D. (2019, September). Analisis Perhitungan Persediaan Bahan Baku dengan Metode FIFO dan Average (Study Kasus pada UMKM AAM Putra Kota Kediri) Tahun 2019. Cahaya Aktiva, 45-46.

Martani dkk. (2016). Akuntansi Keuangan Menengah Berbasis PSAK. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Purwaji, A., Wibowo, & Murtanto. (2016). Pengantar Akuntansi 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Rudianto. (2018). Akuntansi Intermediate. Jakarta: Erlangga

Sari, D. I. (2018). Analisis Perhitungan Persediaan dengan Metode FIFO dan Average pada PT. Harapan. Perspektif, 38.

Sugiono, A., Soenarno, Y. N., & Kusumawati, S. M. (2010). Akuntansi dan Pelaporan Keuangan (untuk Bisnis Skala Kecil dan Menengah). Jakarta: Grasindo

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sujarweni, V. (2016). Pengantar Akuntansi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press

Susanti, P., Wisnubroto, P., & Parwati, C. I. (2018). Analisis Persediaan Biaya Bahan Baku dengan Menggunakan Metode FIFO,LIFO, dan Average Cost pada Produksi Majalah Djaka Lodang pada PT Muria Baru. Jurnal REKAVASI, 99

Republik Indonesia. 2008. UU Nomor 36 Tahun 2008, pasal 10 (6) tentang pajak

Downloads

Published

2022-11-08

How to Cite

Andari, A. T., Setianingsih, N. A., & Pawestri, E. W. . (2022). Comparative Analysis of Cost Flow Assumptions and the Merchandise Inventory Recording System at UD Agung Pratama. Proceedings of Islamic Economics, Business, and Philanthropy, 1(2), 510–521. Retrieved from https://jurnalfebi.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/267

Issue

Section

Articles